The Pope is cleaning house in the Vatican musical establishment. He’s replaced his liturgy director, and may replace his choir director, because:
The International Church Music Review recently criticised the choir, saying: “The singers wanted to overshout each other, they were frequently out of tune, the sound uneven, the conducting without any artistic power, the organ and organ playing like in a second-rank country parish church.”
I see things haven’t changed much since the mid-16th century, when the choir was filled with political appointees and guys who should have retired. I heard snippets from the last papal funeral, and it wasn’t pretty.
He has also broken with the tradition set up by John Paul II of having a rotating choir, drawn from churches all over the world, to sing Mass in St Peter’s.
Oy! Vatican City as choral tourism destination? I’m sure it’s a thrill for the singers to meet the Pope, but I notice that JPII didn’t rotate physicians from all over Christendom to treat him. The bottom-up model of church music might work on a parish level, but it can only go so far.
Of course, Gregorian chant is absolutely primary, and that’s being addressed. What’s a little odd here is the mention of Baroque music specifically, which makes me want to seek out what the Holy Father himself has actually said. (I didn’t find it here.) It’s only been within the past decade or two that baroque Catholic church music has been revived. There are treasures there, to be sure, and it’s part of the Church’s patrimony. But the more I hear of it, the less impressed I am with it as service music, though it has other virtues. The Motu Proprio of 1903 was aimed at music influenced by the bel canto tradition, which is at root a Baroque thing. Some of this music is only about praising God for the human throat, and music can do more. The main aesthetic difference between the music of Johann Adolf Hasse and Marty Haugen is that one actually needs to be able to sing (and sing well) to do Hasse.
Now, Benedict hasn’t asked my advice, but I’m going to give it anyway. St. Peter’s needs to be a liturgical example. Everything needs to be done at the highest level, and that liturgy needs to be broadcast to the world regularly. There needs to be a Catholic equivalent of the Lessons and Carols from King’s College, or the Mormon Tabernacle Choir broadcasts. Parishes will look to Rome for liturgy as well as theology (How can you separate them?) and should be able to experience what “doing it right” means. They may not achieve the same results, but the attempt will improve matters immensely.
To this end, the Pope needs his own R. R. Terry, an inspired and inspiring leader. Next, he needs a professional choir. It doesn’t need to be big; 9 layclerks could do it. But it needs to be top-notch, which means it probably can’t be Italian. Sorry, but the Italians have only begun to figure out how to perform early music in the last decade or so, and it would be easier to import English or Germans. This means they need to be paid, and paid well. Getting the Church to come up off the dime has been a problem, especially in a time when secular courts hold the Church responsible for what went on in individual priest’s pants. But paying such a choir at the rate of a 2nd tier European orchestra would probably cost less per year than one of John Paul’s junkets. It’s not important that the individual singers be Catholic, though that is desirable. The director must be though. An alternative to this might be having an ensemble in residence, such as the deal that Ensemble Cinquecento has with St. Rochus of Vienna. What would it cost to have the Tallis Scholars there for a year, assuming the members would be willing to relocate and do daily services? What would it do for such an ensemble’s understanding of the music? It seems like a win-win situation to me.
UPDATE: And here’s a Protestant doing the same thing.