Churches: more than fried chicken.

Increasingly, I observe that there is a religion called “Catholicism”, which is based on the writings and traditions of the Apostles and has a consistent two-millennium tradition and track record, and another religion called “Catholicism” which is practiced by those born into it, which has different premises about the nature of man, of good and evil, and our responsibilities to God. I’ve had people tell me I’m getting it very wrong, but I don’t think that’s true. And I’ve had other people think I’m a saint, and I KNOW that isn’t true. All I know is that there’s a disjunct.

I recently had a pair of observant Catholics tell me almost braggingly about their year of premarital boinkery…they aren’t the first or only young people to jump the gun, and I of all people have BTDT, but…why are you telling me this? I may be wearing black because I just came from a concert, but I’m not a priest and this is not a confessional.  Likewise, I’ve been told that a priest should ignore older people living together without benefit of clergy and invite them to the Eucharist, and that to expect them to point out that sin is sin is a violation of “grace”.  Hey, forgiveness is a great thing, and I’m willing to forgive you beating me, but you have to put the baseball bat down first, because I want some evidence that you’re sorry.. Jesus is on the Cross for you, right now, so put the hammer and nails down already.

Much the same make-your-own-rules mentality surfaces in the Evangelical churches as well. “Mere Christianity” is rapidly becoming “merely a label”, or this notion that Christianity is doing what Jesus did.  Well, hey, that’s part of it, and I’d be more open to that if you weren’t so convinced that Jesus was a Palestinian Communist agitator, or if you were more open to doing what Jesus did after Palm Sunday.

The folks who want the Church to be a democracy, who think they can make their own rules, are the same people who think that their own whims are the criteria for democratic governance, and that fundamental rules can be changed by majority vote. It’s a cancer that began in the world and is now beseiging the church….which will ultimately make the church useless for fixing it in the world…absent intervention by God.

Apropos of all of this. Fr. Zuhlsdorf’s comments on the Minnesota marriage battle led me to this piece on the decay of Lutheranism, and this description of the ELCA convention of 2009, which I’d totally missed at the time, even though I’d been born Lutheran:

When debate began on the proposed sex statement affirming homosexual relationships, a rare and completely unpredicted tornado struck downtown Minneapolis where the convention was held. It ripped off part of the convention center roof, but even more amazing is what happened to Central Lutheran Church directly across the street. That church had earlier hosted the homosexual lobby’s worship services. The tornado actually knocked the cross over on their steeple. This did not deter the vote which passed the proposal reportedly by 66.6%. Many observers did not dismiss these signs as coincidences.


One Response to Churches: more than fried chicken.

  1. jeffrey smith says:

    It’s a matter of ecclesiology. The Church is the Body of Christ, guided and led by the Holy Spirit–and that means it’s not (ultimately) the bishops and clergy who lead the people in the pews, but the Spirit, and ultimately the Spirit will lead them where It wants them to go, just as It led them for the last two thousand years to produce all that Tradition. IOW, Catholicism is both–the tradition developed over the last two thousand years and what the people in the pews are doing now. Discernment is the art of bringing the two together in a united whole and that can only be done as a sort of consensus of the whole Church, under (as always) the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

    Which is more or less straight out of Eastern Orthodox theology. I ought to see. Not just my rambling.

    And Jesus was a Palestinian Communist agitator, or as close to it as one could be nineteen hundred years before Marx.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: